Who is better, Walther or Samsonov?
Vladimir Samsonov leads with a GOAT score of 74.5 against 74.3 for Ricardo Walther — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Vladimir Samsonov above Ricardo Walther: 74.5 vs 74.3. Vladimir Samsonov leads on Longevity. Ricardo Walther leads on Honours, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Samsonov wins: Longevity
Walther wins: Honours, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/ricardo-walther-tt-vs-samsonov
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Samsonov leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇩🇪 Walther | 0 | 0 | 42 | 88 | 250 | 522 |
| 🇧🇾 Samsonov | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 23 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | WaltherActive | SamsonovRetired |
|---|---|---|
| European team titles | 2 | — |
| European Games medals | 1 | — |
| Career world ranking best | 35 | — |
| Bundesliga seasons | 16 | — |
| National medals | 4 | — |
| World Cup titles | — | 3 |
| European Championship singles titles | — | 3 |
| World Championship medals | — | 2 |
| Olympic appearances | — | 6 |
| Best world ranking | — | 1 |
| Years at top level | — | 30 |
| Dominance w25% | 66 | 66 |
| Peak w20% | 78 | 78 |
| Longevity w20% | 80 | 90 |
| Honours w20% | 74 | 68 |
| Statistics w15% | 76 | 72 |
Vladimir Samsonov leads with a GOAT score of 74.5 against 74.3 for Ricardo Walther — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Walther scores higher on honours, statistics. Samsonov leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Walther: 74.3, Samsonov: 74.5.
Make your case for Walther vs Samsonov. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.