Who is better, De Vicenzo or Snead?
Roberto De Vicenzo leads with a GOAT score of 89.2 against 89.0 for Sam Snead — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Roberto De Vicenzo above Sam Snead: 89.2 vs 89.0. Roberto De Vicenzo leads on Peak, Statistics. Sam Snead leads on Dominance, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →De Vicenzo wins: Peak, Statistics
Snead wins: Dominance, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/roberto-de-vicenzo-vs-sam-snead
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
De Vicenzo leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇦🇷 De Vicenzo | 0 | 0 | 30 | 62 | 172 | 349 |
| 🇺🇸 Snead | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 28 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | De VicenzoRetired | SneadRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Open Championships | 1 | — |
| Professional wins worldwide | 230 | — |
| Argentine Open titles | 9 | — |
| World Cup team titles | 1 | — |
| Seasons played | 48 | — |
| PGA Tour wins | — | 82 |
| Major titles | — | 7 |
| Masters titles | — | 3 |
| PGA Championships | — | 3 |
| Vardon Trophies | — | 4 |
| Ryder Cup appearances | — | 7 |
| Dominance w25% | 84 | 86 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 96 | 96 |
| Honours w20% | 84 | 86 |
| Statistics w15% | 92 | 90 |
Roberto De Vicenzo leads with a GOAT score of 89.2 against 89.0 for Sam Snead — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Snead scores higher on dominance, honours. De Vicenzo leads on peak, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. De Vicenzo: 89.2, Snead: 89.0.
Make your case for De Vicenzo vs Snead. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.