Who is better, Sergachev or Ehlers?
Mikhail Sergachev leads with a GOAT score of 54.2 against 54.0 for Nikolaj Ehlers — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Sergachev vs Ehlers
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
SergachevWinner
54.2Sergachev wins: Dominance, Honours
Ehlers
54.0Ehlers wins: Peak, Longevity, Statistics
Candidates
Locked to Ice HockeyShareable URL · /compare/ros-mikhail-sergachev-vs-ros-nikolaj-ehlers
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🏳️ Mikhail Sergachev
54.2
Sergachev leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Mikhail Sergachev
2. Nikolaj Ehlers
Category breakdown
Season form · Points per season
Career timeline · Points per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Points per season1. 🏳️ Nikolaj Ehlers5 seasons played · career day 1,825257 points
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🏳️ Mikhail Sergachev5 seasons played · career day 1,826136 points
-47.1% vs Ehlers at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏳️ Sergachev | 0 | 0 | 0 | 40 | 106 | 310 |
| 🏳️ Ehlers | 0 | 0 | 38 | 102 | 257 | 457 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Sergachev54.2
Ehlers54.0
FAQ
Where does Ehlers beat Sergachev?
Ehlers scores higher on peak, statistics, longevity. Sergachev leads on dominance, honours.
How is the Sergachev vs Ehlers score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Sergachev: 54.2, Ehlers: 54.0.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Sergachev vs Ehlers. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.