Who is better, Herd or Elkington?
Sandy Herd leads with a GOAT score of 81.9 against 81.9 for Steve Elkington — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Sandy Herd and Steve Elkington level at 81.9. Sandy Herd leads on Longevity. Steve Elkington leads on Honours, Dominance, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Herd wins: Longevity
Elkington wins: Dominance, Honours, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/sandy-herd-vs-steve-elkington
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Herd leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇬🇧 Herd | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| 🇦🇺 Elkington | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | HerdRetired | ElkingtonRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Open Championship titles | 1 | — |
| Open runner-up finishes | 4 | — |
| Professional wins | 14 | — |
| News of the World Match Play titles | 1 | — |
| Career span in years | 46 | — |
| Major titles | — | 1 |
| PGA Tour wins | — | 10 |
| Players Championship wins | — | 2 |
| Presidents Cup appearances | — | 5 |
| Career-high world ranking | — | 4 |
| Dominance w25% | 72 | 74 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 94 | 86 |
| Honours w20% | 74 | 78 |
| Statistics w15% | 82 | 84 |
Sandy Herd leads with a GOAT score of 81.9 against 81.9 for Steve Elkington — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Elkington scores higher on dominance, honours, statistics. Herd leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Herd: 81.9, Elkington: 81.9.
Make your case for Herd vs Elkington. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.