Who is better, Shin or Monteiro?
Thiago Monteiro leads with a GOAT score of 77.6 against 77.4 for Shin Yu-bin — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Thiago Monteiro above Shin Yu-bin: 77.6 vs 77.4. Thiago Monteiro leads on Longevity. Shin Yu-bin leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Monteiro wins: Longevity
Shin wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/shin-yu-bin-vs-thiago-monteiro-tt
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Monteiro leads in 1 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇰🇷 Shin | 0 | 0 | 58 | 128 | 392 | 570 |
| 🇧🇷 Monteiro | 0 | 0 | 44 | 91 | 253 | 516 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | ShinActive | MonteiroRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic medals | 2 | — |
| World Championship medals | 2 | — |
| WTT titles | 3 | — |
| Asian Championship medals | 3 | — |
| Career high world ranking | 4 | — |
| Pan American Games golds | — | 2 |
| Latin American titles | — | 5 |
| Olympic appearances | — | 4 |
| Career world ranking best | — | 32 |
| Brazilian titles | — | 8 |
| Dominance w25% | 76 | 70 |
| Peak w20% | 86 | 80 |
| Longevity w20% | 66 | 86 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 76 |
| Statistics w15% | 80 | 78 |
Thiago Monteiro leads with a GOAT score of 77.6 against 77.4 for Shin Yu-bin — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shin scores higher on peak, dominance, honours, statistics. Monteiro leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Shin: 77.4, Monteiro: 77.6.
Make your case for Shin vs Monteiro. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.