Who is better, Flisberg or Wu?
Wu Yang leads with a GOAT score of 82.6 against 82.5 for Tage Flisberg — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Flisberg vs Wu
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Wu Yang above Tage Flisberg: 82.6 vs 82.5. Wu Yang leads on Honours, Dominance, Peak. Tage Flisberg leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
WuWinner
82.6Wu wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Flisberg
82.5Flisberg wins: Longevity
Candidates
Locked to Table TennisShareable URL · /compare/tage-flisberg-vs-wu-yang-tt
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇨🇳 Wu Yang
82.6
Wu leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Wu Yang
2. Tage Flisberg
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Form index per season1. 🇨🇳 Wu Yang5 seasons played · career day 1,825363 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇸🇪 Tage Flisberg5 seasons played · career day 1,825307 titles
-15.4% vs Wu at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇸🇪 Flisberg | 0 | 0 | 45 | 98 | 307 | 648 |
| 🇨🇳 Wu | 0 | 0 | 50 | 111 | 363 | 606 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Wu82.6
Flisberg82.5
FAQ
Where does Flisberg beat Wu?
Flisberg scores higher on longevity. Wu leads on peak, dominance, honours.
How is the Flisberg vs Wu score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Flisberg: 82.5, Wu: 82.6.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Flisberg vs Wu. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.