GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Flisberg vs Čordaš

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
FlisbergWinner
82.5

Flisberg wins: Longevity

Čordaš
82.4

Čordaš wins: Statistics

Candidates
Locked to Table Tennis

Shareable URL · /compare/tage-flisberg-vs-zlatko-cordas

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇸🇪 Tage Flisberg
82.5

Flisberg leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories. World team medallist and a European-level Swedish pioneer.

1. Tage Flisberg
82.5
2. Zlatko Čordaš
82.4

Category breakdown

Season form · Titles per season

Career timeline · Titles per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Titles per season
1. 🇭🇷 Zlatko Čordaš5 seasons played · career day 1,826336 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇸🇪 Tage Flisberg5 seasons played · career day 1,825307 titles
-8.6% vs Čordaš at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇸🇪 Flisberg004598307648
🇭🇷 Čordaš0050109252666

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricFlisbergRetiredČordašRetired
World Championship medals42
World team medals3
Swedish titles5
Nordic titles4
Seasons at the top9
European Championship medals2
Yugoslav titles4
World Championship appearances5
Swaythling Cup appearances5
Dominance w25%7878
Peak w20%8888
Longevity w20%8280
Honours w20%8282
Statistics w15%8486

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Flisberg82.5
Čordaš82.4
The people
Flisberg
Čordaš

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Flisberg vs Čordaš. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →