Who is better, Macfarlane or Tseng?
Willie Macfarlane leads with a GOAT score of 75.7 against 75.7 for Yani Tseng — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Willie Macfarlane and Yani Tseng level at 75.7. Willie Macfarlane leads on Longevity, Peak. Yani Tseng leads on Dominance, Honours, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Macfarlane wins: Peak, Longevity
Tseng wins: Dominance, Honours, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/willie-macfarlane-vs-yani-tseng
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Macfarlane leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Macfarlane | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 10 |
| 🇹🇼 Tseng | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 15 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | MacfarlaneRetired | TsengActive |
|---|---|---|
| Major titles | 1 | 5 |
| PGA Tour wins | 7 | — |
| US Open top-tens | 5 | — |
| Career span in years | 22 | — |
| Metropolitan Open titles | 2 | — |
| LPGA Tour wins | — | 15 |
| Weeks at No. 1 | — | 109 |
| Player of the Year | — | 2 |
| Vare Trophies | — | 1 |
| Wins in 2011 | — | 7 |
| Dominance w25% | 64 | 74 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 82 | 62 |
| Honours w20% | 68 | 76 |
| Statistics w15% | 78 | 80 |
Willie Macfarlane leads with a GOAT score of 75.7 against 75.7 for Yani Tseng — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Tseng scores higher on dominance, honours, statistics. Macfarlane leads on peak, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Macfarlane: 75.7, Tseng: 75.7.
Make your case for Macfarlane vs Tseng. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.